Wed 02/21/2024 17:35 PM
Share this article:
Relevant Documents:
Voluntary Petition
First Day Declaration / RSA
DIP Financing / Cash Collateral Motion
Bidding Procedures Motion
Press Release
Notice of First Day Hearing
 
Summary
Hornblower RSA would equitize first lien claims, reduce debt by $720 million and hand majority ownership to Strategic Value Partners
Company enters bankruptcy with a $300 million senior DIP facility from Deutsche Bank AG New York Branch and a $285 million junior DIP facility from prepetition lenders
Debtors to raise capital through $345 million equity rights offering backstopped by consenting secured lenders, with $350M in exit facilities upon emergence

Hornblower Holdings, a San Francisco-based company specializing in water-based and land-based experiences and transportation, and several affiliates filed petitions today in the Southern District of Texas, reporting $500 million to $1 billion in assets and $1 billion to $10 billion in liabilities. The company enters chapter 11 with a restructuring support agreement with funds managed by Strategic Value Partners, or SVP, and majority equityholder and sponsor Crestview Advisors LLC.

Broadly, under the RSA, the company’s total debt would be reduced by approximately $720 million, majority ownership would be handed to SVP, and Crestview would retain a minority position, according to a press release. The debtors face an RSA milestone to emerge from chapter 11 by July 10, subject to up to a 30-day extension by the debtors to obtain regulatory approvals.

In connection with the RSA, Crestview would become the sole owner of nondebtor entity Journey Beyond, a stand-alone operating unit of Hornblower and “the leading experiential travel provider in Australia.” Journey Beyond’s term loans would either be rolled with balance and terms unchanged or refinanced, implementation of which would be outside of the chapter 11 process.

Hornblower’s overnight cruising business American Queen Voyages, or AQV, on the other hand, would be sold or wound down, in light of the business’ “underperformance,” which has “not rebounded from the pandemic,” according to the press release.

The debtors’ bid procedures motion for a sale of the AQV business assets proposes a sale hearing on April 2. The motion includes procedures to dispose of any remaining assets including AQV’s seven-vessel fleet not sold through the sale process.

In addition, pursuant to the RSA, the debtors obtained commitments for DIP financing consisting of two senior secured term loan facilities: (a) a $300 senior facility, which would be used to refinance the company’s existing superpriority term loan and a further commitment to provide a new $50 million senior secured first lien revolving credit facility, or the senior DIP facility, from Deutsche Bank AG New York Branch; and (b) a $285 million junior facility, consisting of up to $121 million in new-money DIP loans and $164 million in DIP loans to refinance a previously funded emergency incremental superpriority bridge facility.

According to the RSA term sheet attached to the first day declaration of Chief Restructuring Officer Jonathan Hickman of Alvarez & Marsal, the debtors’ financial advisor, the pro rata allocation for all debt and equity investments, including DIP financing, backstop or other commitments, with respect to Crestview equals 27.79%, and with respect to SVP and its affiliates equals 72.21%.

In addition, the RSA contemplates, on the effective date, exit facilities comprising a $300 million senior secured term loan and a $50 million senior secured revolving credit facility pursuant to an exit credit term sheet, and a $345 million rights offering for new common equity of the reorganized Hornblower debtor. Such new equity would be issued at a discount of 30% to the implied “post-money” plan equity value of $448 million, which the debtors say reflects a total enterprise value of $725 million. Proceeds from the rights offering, the exit term loan and the exit revolver would be used to meet a projected minimum liquidity amount of $25 million on the plan effective date, according to the RSA term sheet.

Certain consenting revolver lenders and consenting first lien lenders would backstop the rights offering. Under the backstop commitment agreement attached to the RSA term sheet, backstop parties would be entitled to a premium equal to 10% of the rights offering amount, which would be paid in the form of new common equity on the plan effective date, plus payment of fees and expenses.

According to the debtors, the rights offering would result in participants’ and backstop parties’ aggregate ownership of 85% of the new common equity as of the effective date, subject to reduction on account of potential downsizing of the rights offering amount and dilution by issuances of management incentive plan, or MIP, equity.

The RSA term sheet adds that proceeds of the rights offering would be used to satisfy the junior DIP facility and fund the operations of the reorganized debtors. The term sheet notes that any rights offering participant that is a junior DIP lender may elect to have their junior DIP loan claims netted against the subscription price payable in respect of the rights offering, with any shortfall amount to be paid in cash.

The company is concurrently commencing ancillary proceedings in Canada under the Companies' Creditors Arrangement Act, or CCAA, to seek recognition of the U.S. bankruptcy proceedings in Canada. Hornblower Holdings would serve as the foreign representative.

The first day hearing is scheduled for today, Wednesday, Feb. 21, at 6 p.m. ET.

The case has been assigned to Judge Marvin Isgur (case No. 24-90061). The debtors are represented by Paul Weiss as counsel and Porter Hedges as local counsel. Guggenheim Securities LLC serves as the debtors’ investment banker, and Alvarez & Marsal North America is the debtors’ restructuring advisor. The debtors’ claims agent is Omni Agent Solutions.

The ad hoc group of secured lenders is advised by Milbank as counsel, Perella Weinberg Partners LP as investment banker and FTI Consulting as financial advisor. Crestview is advised by Davis Polk. White & Case is counsel to the senior DIP lenders. GLAS Trust Co. LLC, as agent under the senior DIP facility, is represented by Seward & Kissel. GLAS Trust Co. LLC, as agent under the junior DIP facility and first lien credit agreement, is advised by ArentFox.

Alter Domus (US) LLC, as agent under the superpriority credit agreement, is represented by Norton Rose Fulbright. Counsel to UBS AG, Stamford Branch, as agent under the revolving credit agreement, is Cahill Gordon & Reindel.

Prepetition Capital Structure

The company’s prepetition capital structure includes the following:
 

Nondebtor Journey Beyond entities owe $437.6 million of secured debt obligations, including $262.6 million of JB OpCo term loan facility and $175.1 million of JBIH term facility, as of the petition date.

None of the debtor’s assets are pledged as collateral under the JB OpCo facility. However, on Feb. 15, 2022, debtor Hornblower Holdings LP provided a limited guarantee of the JB OpCo credit agreement. The guarantee provides for a limited guarantee of the excess, if any, of (i) $56.5 million over (ii) (A) the amount of cash contributed by Hornblower Holdings LP to HB TopCo at any time after Feb. 15, 2022, minus (B) any payment made by Hornblower Holdings LP in respect of the obligations under the JB OpCo credit agreement.

None of the debtors provide credit support for the JBIH credit agreement, except that debtor Hornblower Group Holdco LLC has pledged the equity interests of its wholly owned subsidiary debtor Hornblower Group LLC as collateral for the obligations under the JBIH credit agreement, and debtor Hornblower Group LLC guarantees the obligations under the JBIH credit agreement.

The capital structure includes the following intercompany debt:
 
  • Intercompany note from JBIH, or Journey Beyond Intermediate Holdings LLC, to HB TopCo, HB TopCo Pty Ltd, of $132.7 million, which matures on Jan. 31, 2029, and bears interest at 17% payable-in-kind;
     
  • Intercompany unsecured note from JB OpCo to JBH, or Journey Beyond Holdings LLC, of $100.8 million, where JBH in turn provided the loan on an unsecured basis to American Queen Sub, LLC, or AQV;
     
  • Intercompany unsecured loan from JBIH to AQV of $10 million; and
     
  • Unsecured term promissory note from Hornblower Sub LLC to JB OpCo of $3.4 million.
     
The debtors’ largest unsecured creditors consist solely of trade claims, except for one contingent, unliquidated and disputed litigation claimant.

Each of the debtors, other than Hornblower Holdings LLC, Hornblower Holdings LP, Hornblower HoldCo, LLC and American Queen Holdings LLC, is 100% owned by its direct parent. Hornblower Holdings LLC is the general partner of Hornblower Holdings LP. Equity sponsor Crestview holds approximately 81.63% of equity interests in Hornblower Holdings LLC, with the remainder held by management and owners of the company prior to the Crestview acquisition.

Hornblower Holdings LP is the ultimate parent of each of the debtors, and its partnership interests are privately held. Crestview holds approximately 78% of the common and preferred limited partnership interests in Hornblower Holdings LP, and the remaining interests are held by management team and rollover holders.

The debtors’ organizational chart is HERE.

Creditors include the following parties shown below, according to the Reorg CLO database:
 

The complete Reorg CLO database can be accessed HERE.

Background / Events Leading to Bankruptcy Filing

According to the first day declaration of CRO Hickman, the company is “one of the largest and most diversified” providers of tourism and transportation services, with more than 30 million guest trips across 111 countries annually. The debtors operated three primary business lines: (i) City Experiences, including City Cruises, City Ferry and Walks; (ii) American Queen Voyages, or AQV, and (iii) Journey Beyond. The business includes overnight cruising, land- and water-based experiences, ferry and transportation services and an experiential travel group in Australia.

The company has approximately 6,000 employees as of the petition date, says Hickman.

According to Hickman, the Covid-19 pandemic adversely affected the company’s financial condition and operating performance. Hickman notes that prior to the pandemic, the business experienced years of significant growth and profitability, with revenue peaking at $690 million in 2019.

To navigate the pandemic, the company engaged in a “series of liquidity enhancing transactions” with its largest lenders and funds managed by sponsor Crestview. The debtors’ debt load increased to $1.2 billion in 2023 from $630 million in 2019, with annual cash interest expense increasing to $115 million from $38 million - all of which has been difficult for the company to shoulder, says Hickman, even though most of the company’s businesses returned to pre-Covid profitability, with the exception of the AQV business, which continued to underperform.

In July 2023, the company started a sale process for its Journey Beyond business, but by late September 2023 it became “apparent” that a sale would “unlikely” generate sufficient excess proceeds to solve the company’s long-term liquidity needs and that, absent a deleveraging transaction, the company’s capital structure within the Hornblower silo would be unsustainable.

In October 2023, the debtors started negotiations with the ad hoc group of secured lenders regarding a comprehensive recapitalization. As detailed in the Hickman declaration, the ad hoc group agreed to provide bridge financing of $60 million pursuant to an incremental superpriority facility, which supported the debtors’ operations beyond mid-November. In December, the facility was upsized by an additional $110 million to support funding needs through mid-February while the parties continued discussions.

Also in December, the company marketed its AQV business assets, which yielded two nonbinding indications of interests for certain assets but no actionable indications of interests for a going-concern sale. In consultation with the ad hoc group, the company determined that using the chapter 11 process to effectuate a sale of all or substantially all of the AQV business assets and otherwise wind down this business would be in the best interest of the estates.

Ultimately, the debtors’ negotiations with key stakeholders resulted in the RSA. Under the RSA, existing first lien term claims would be equitized, the AQV business would be sold or wound down, and the Australia-based Journey Beyond business would be separated from the debtors.

The debtors' largest unsecured creditors are as follows:
 
10 Largest Unsecured Creditors
 Creditor Location Claim Type Amount 
Seatran Marine New Iberia,
La.
Trade $   3,995,938
Pleasant Holidays Lake Village, Calif. Trade 943,671
Easton Coach Company Easton,
Pa.
Trade 804,812
Intercruises
Shoreside and
Port Services
Barcelona Trade 792,329
U.S. Postal Service Washington, D.C. Trade 743,750
Bay Ship & Yacht Co. Alameda, Calif. Trade 693,852
Vacations To Go Houston Trade 570,399
Port of San Diego San Diego, Calif. Trade 480,288
Mittera Group Des Moines, Iowa Trade 451,520
Harbor Fuel Boston Trade 436,939

The case representatives are as follows:
 
Representatives
 Role Name Firm Location
Debtors'
Co-Counsel
Paul M. Basta

Jacob A. Adlerstein

Kyle Kimpler

Sarah Harnett

Neda Davanipour
Paul, Weiss,
Rifkind,
Wharton
& Garrison
New York
Debtors'
Co-Counsel
John F. Higgins

M. Shane Johnson

Megan Young-John
Porter Hedges Houston
Debtors'
Investment
Banker
Matthew Scheidemann

John Welsh

Rupak Rajaram
Guggenheim
Securities
New York
Debtors'
Restructuring
Advisor
& CRO
Jonathan Hickman Alvarez
& Marsal
North
America
Charlotte,
N.C.
Counsel
to Ad
Hoc Group
Evan Fleck

Matthew Brod

Justin Cunningham
Milbank New York
Investment
Banker to
Ad Hoc Group
NA Perella
Weinberg
Partners
NA
Financial
Advisor to
Ad Hoc Group
NA FTI
Consulting
NA
Counsel to
Crestview
Adam L. Shpeen

David Kratzer

Robert (Bodie) Stewart

Joseph W. Brown
Davis Polk
& Wardwell
New York
Counsel to
Senior DIP
Lenders
Andrew Zatz

David Ridley

Andrea Amulic
White
& Case
New York
Counsel to
Alter Domus
as Superpriority
Credit
Agreement
Agent
NA Norton
Rose
Fulbright US
New York
Counsel to
GLAS Trust
Company as
Senior DIP
Facility Agent
John R. Ashmead

Gregg S. Bateman
Seward
& Kissel
New York
Counsel to
GLAS Trust
Company as
Junior DIP
Facility Agent
NA ArentFox
Schiff
New York
Counsel to
UBS AG
Stamford
Branch
NA Cahill
Gordon
& Reindel
New York
U.S. Trustee Jayson B. Ruff Office of the
U.S. Trustee
Houston
Debtors’
Claims
Agent
Brian K. Osborne Omni
Agent
Solutions
Woodland
Hills,
Calif.

RSA / Term Sheet

The debtors’ RSA, executed as of today with SVP and sponsor Crestview, provides for a total debt reduction of approximately $720 million. SVP would assume majority ownership while Crestview would retain a minority position.

Classification and Treatment of Claims and Interests

The RSA term sheet provides for the following classification and treatment of claims and interests:
 
  • DIP claims: Would receive full cash payment from the proceeds of the rights offering, or with respect to the senior DIP loans, such loans would convert to exit term loans in accordance with the senior DIP credit agreement and the RSA.
    • Voting: Not classified; nonvoting.
       
  • Administrative claims: Would receive full cash payment of the unpaid portion of such allowed claims on the plan effective date or as soon thereafter as reasonably practicable.
    • Administrative claims would include claims under Bankruptcy Code section 503(b), allowed claims for reasonable fee and expenses retained in the chapter 11 cases and the CCAA proceeding, and backstop expenses pursuant to the backstop purchase agreement and the backstop order.
    • Voting: Not classified; nonvoting.
       
  • Priority tax claims: Would receive treatment in accordance with Bankruptcy Code section 1129(a)(9)C).
    • Voting: Not classified; nonvoting.
       
  • Other secured claims: Would receive either (a) full cash payment of the unpaid portion of such allowed claims, including interest pursuant to Bankruptcy Code section 506(b) (or if payment is not then due, on the due date of such allowed claims), (b) reinstatement pursuant to Bankruptcy Code section 1124, (c) return or abandonment of collateral securing such claims, or (d) other treatment necessary to satisfy Bankruptcy Code section 1129.
    • Voting: Unimpaired; deemed to accept the plan.
       
  • Other priority claims: Would receive full cash payment of the unpaid portion of such allowed claims on the plan effective date or as soon thereafter as reasonably practicable (or, if payment is not then due, on the due date of such allowed claims).
    • Voting: Unimpaired; deemed to accept the plan.
       
  • First lien claims: On the plan effective date or as soon thereafter as reasonably practicable, such claims would receive their pro rata share of (a) 96% of the “Rights” in relation to the rights offering, (b) 96% of new common equity, subject to dilution on account of new common equity issued in connection with the rights offerings, the backstop commitment premium and the MIP equity, and (c) $50 million in cash funded to the Hornblower debtors by Crestview or an affiliate, or the Crestview cash distribution, provided that holders may elect to use their pro rata share of the Crestview cash distribution as a credit toward the exercise of its rights, in which case such portion of the Crestview cash distribution would be retained by the Hornblower debtors.
    • Voting: Impaired; entitled to vote on the plan.
    • Allowance: Aggregate principal of $696 million, plus accrued and unpaid interest, fees and other amounts payable under the first lien credit agreement accrued as of the petition date.
       
  • Revolver claims: On the plan effective date or as soon thereafter as reasonably practicable, such claims would receive their pro rata share of (a) 4% of the “Rights” in relation to the rights offering and (b) 4% of the new common equity, subject to dilution on account of new common equity issued in connection with the rights offering, the backstop commitment premium and the MIP equity.
    • Voting: Impaired; entitled to vote on the plan.
    • Allowance: Aggregate principal of $26 million, plus accrued and unpaid interest, fees and other amounts payable under the revolver credit agreement, accrued as of the petition date.
       
  • General unsecured claims: On the plan effective date or as soon thereafter as reasonably practicable, such claims would receive treatment acceptable to the debtors and the required consenting HB first lien lenders.
    • Voting: Impaired; entitled to vote on the plan.
       
  • Intercompany claims: All claims against a debtor held by another debtor would be adjusted, reinstated or discharged as determined by the company parties, subject to the reasonable consent of the required consenting HB first lien lenders.
    • Voting: Unimpaired; deemed to accept the plan; or impaired; deemed to reject the plan.
       
  • Interests in company party subsidiaries: Excluding the AQV debtors, all existing interests in company parties other than Hornblower would be reinstated or canceled in the company parties’ discretion, subject to the reasonable consent of: (a) with respect to the reorganized Hornblower debtors, the required consenting HB first lien lenders; (b) with respect to the Journey Beyond entities, the consenting JBIH lenders. Interests in American Queen HoldCo LLC would be canceled as of the effective date.
    • Voting: Unimpaired; deemed to accept the plan; or impaired; deemed to reject the plan.
       
  • Section 510(b) claims: Claims subject to subordination under Bankruptcy Code section 510(b) would receive no recovery.
    • Voting: Impaired; deemed to reject the plan.
       
  • Interests in Hornblower: All interests in Hornblower and Hornblower Holdings LLC would be canceled. Holders would not receive or retain any distribution, property or other value on account of their interests.
    • Voting: Impaired; deemed to reject the plan.

Exit Facilities / Term Sheet

As noted above, the RSA contemplates two exit facilities consisting of a $300 million senior secured term loan and a $50 million senior secured revolving credit facility. The terms provide for incremental facilities, subject to certain terms.

The exit facilities would bear interest, at the option of the borrower, of adjusted term SOFR plus 5.75% or the reference rate plus 4.75%, with a default premium of 2% per annum.

Adjusted term SOFR means the greater of term SOFR and 1%. The reference rate is defined as the greatest of (i) the rate of interest publicly quoted by The Wall Street Journal as the “Prime Rate” in the United States, (ii) the federal funds effective rate plus 0.5% and (iii) adjusted term SOFR for an interest period of one-month plus 1%. The borrower may elect interest periods of one, three or six months (or a shorter period if agreed to by the administrative agent and all lenders) for adjusted term SOFR.

The exit facilities would mature five years after the closing date.

Rights Offering / Backstop Agreement

Under the debtors’ backstop commitment agreement dated today, the debtors would conduct a rights offering for a maximum aggregate purchase price of $345 million, subject to reductions pursuant to the RSA, at a purchase price per subscription equity interest calculated at 30% discount to the plan equity value.

Backstop parties would be entitled to a premium equal to 10% of the rights offering amount, which would be paid in the form of new common equity on the plan effective date, plus payment of fees and expenses.

New Board

According to the RSA term sheet, the new board would consist of five members, four of which would be designated by SVP and one of which would be selected by Crestview or its related funds. The terms provide that Crestview may remove its designee at any time and appoint a new member as long as Crestview and its related funds retain at least 50% of the new common equity owned by Crestview and its related funds as of the effective date.

The terms also provide that directors would be appointed by a majority vote of shareholders, except with respect to Crestview’s designee subject to holding requirements. Appointment rights would not be transferable except in connection with a sale of at least 75% of the new common equity owned by Crestview and its related funds or SVP as of the effective date.

Management Incentive Plan

The new board would adopt a MIP under which 8% of new common equity issued as of the effective date on a fully diluted basis would be reserved. The new board would determine the allocation of the MIP equity within 60 days after the effective date, with additional terms that provide for the termination of employment within 30 days after the end of the negotiation period to the extent any key executive is not satisfied with their allocation under the MIP, including entitlement to severance benefits, if any.

Other Provisions

According to an RSA schedule, the plan would provide exculpation in favor of the debtors, the reorganized debtors and CRO Hickman. Released parties would include each of the debtors, the reorganized debtors, consenting stakeholders, agents, DIP agents, DIP lenders and backstop parties, plus their current and former affiliates, directors, officers, managers and professionals, unless a party elects to opt out of the releases or files an objection to the plan that is not resolved prior to confirmation.

Releasing parties would be the released parties, plus holders of claims that vote to accept the plan and holders that do not elect to opt out of the releases. Any holder that elects to opt out of the releases or objects to the plan would not be a releasing party.

Milestones

RSA milestones are as follows:
 
  • Feb. 26 (no later than three business days after the petition date): Entry of interim DIP order;
  • March 7 (no later than 10 days after entry of interim DIP order): Entry of interim DIP recognition order by the CCAA court;
  • March 7 (no later than 15 days after the petition date): Entry of AQV bidding procedures order;
  • March 13 (no later than 21 days after the petition date): Plan, disclosure statement, DS approval motion and backstop motion filing deadline;
  • April 6 (no later than 45 days after the petition date): Entry of final DIP order and AQV sale order;
  • April 16 (no later than 10 days after entry of final DIP order): Entry of final DIP recognition order by CCAA court;
  • April 21 (no later than 60 days after the petition date): Entry of DS order and backstop order;
  • June 20 (no later than 120 days after the petition date): Entry of plan confirmation order;
  • June 30 (no later than 10 days after entry of plan confirmation order): Entry of confirmation recognition order by CCAA court; and
  • July 10 (no later than 140 days after the petition date): Occurrence of plan effective date, subject to up to a 30-day extension by the debtors to obtain regulatory approvals.
     
DIP Financing / Cash Collateral Motion

The debtors seek approval of two senior secured term loan DIP financing facilities: a senior facility in an aggregate principal amount of $300 million and a junior facility in an aggregate principal amount of $285 million. The senior DIP facility provides for the refinancing of the prepetition superpriority loans and a further commitment to provide a new $50 million senior secured first lien revolving credit facility to provide working capital for the debtors upon emergence. According to the Hickman declaration, the senior DIP facility would provide a net liquidity benefit of approximately $13 million after the refinancing.

The junior DIP facility consists of up to $121 million in DIP loans to provide incremental liquidity to fund the cases and $164 million in DIP loans to refinance previously funded emergency prepetition loans under the incremental superpriority facility. Deutsche Bank AG New York Branch is providing the senior DIP facility, and prepetition lenders are providing the junior DIP facility.

According to the declaration of Matthew Scheidemann of Guggenheim Securities, the debtors’ proposed investment banker, in support of the DIP motion, although the debtors reached out to third-party financing sources, none of them were willing to extend financing on an unsecured or junior basis or engage in a priming fight with any secured lenders.

In addition, Scheidemann says the ad hoc group would not consent to the debtors’ incurring other financing by any other party having priming or pari passu liens on collateral securing the obligations of the group, but the group was supportive of the senior DIP facility.

Upon entry of the interim DIP order, the entirety of the senior DIP facility would become available to “immediately refinance the Superpriority Facility,” and $224 million of the junior DIP facility would become available to provide the debtors with working capital and to fund the chapter 11 cases.

The debtors also seek the consensual use of cash collateral of certain secured lenders to Hornblower’s first lien credit agreement with Glas Trust as administrative agent and its RCF credit agreement with UBS as administrative agent.

ABR borrowing under the senior DIP facility bears interest at the greatest of (i) the prime rate, (ii) the federal funds effective rate “plus ½ of 1.00%,” and (iii) adjusted term SOFR+1%, plus 5.5% (which amount is increased to 6% if a PIK election has been made), provided that 3% is payable-in-kind on each interest payment date unless timely elected to be paid in cash, with a 2% default premium.

Term SOFR borrowing under the senior DIP facility bears interest at the adjusted term SOFR+6.5% (which amount is increased to 7% if a PIK election has been made), provided that 3.5% is payable-in-kind on each interest payment date unless timely elected to be paid in cash, with a 2% default premium.

ABR borrowing under the junior DIP facility bears interest at the greatest of (i) the prime rate, (ii) the federal funds effective rate plus half of 1%, and (iii) adjusted term SOFR+1%, plus 8%, with a 2% default premium.

Term SOFR borrowing under the junior DIP facility bears interest at adjusted term SOFR+9%, with a 2% default premium.

Both the senior and junior DIP facilities mature on the earlier of the plan effective date and nine months after the petition date.

To secure the senior DIP financing, the debtors propose to grant senior secured superpriority liens on substantially all assets and property of the debtors, subject to certain permitted exceptions, liens and the carve-out, and upon entry of the final DIP order, avoidance action proceeds. The junior DIP financing would be secured by junior secured superpriority liens on substantially all assets and property of the debtors, subject to the senior DIP liens, certain permitted exceptions and senior liens and the carve-out, and upon entry of the final DIP order, avoidance action proceeds.

Both facilities include various fees. The senior DIP facility has an exit premium, calculated as 1.5% of the aggregate principal amount of term loans, and an extension fee, calculated as 1% of the aggregate term loans outstanding eight months after the closing date. The junior DIP facility includes a closing fee of 4% of the commitments in effect on the closing date, a DDTL commitment fee of 1% of undrawn amounts of delayed draw term loans, and an exit premium, calculated as 4% of the aggregate principal amount of term loans.

The company proposes the following adequate protection to its DIP lenders: superpriority administrative claims and adequate protection liens subject to the DIP liens, the carve-out and the prepetition permitted senior liens, certain reporting rights, and reimbursement for the reasonable and documented prepetition and postpetition professional fees of the prepetition agents.

In addition, the debtors propose a waiver of the estates’ right to seek to surcharge its collateral pursuant to Bankruptcy Code section 506(c) and the “equities of the case” exception under section 552(b), subject to entry of the final DIP order.

The post-termination carve-out for professional fees is $4.5 million.

The proposed budget for the use of the DIP facility is HERE.

The DIP financing is subject to the same RSA milestones, as outlined above.

The lien challenge deadline is 60 days after the appointment of an official unsecured creditors committee, subject to extension if a chapter 7 or chapter 11 trustee is appointed prior to the end of the challenge period. The UCC lien investigation budget is $50,000.

Bid Procedures Motion

The debtors’ bid procedures motion seeks authority to sell all or substantially all of their AQV business assets and to potentially enter into one or more stalking horse agreements with bid protections consisting of a 3% breakup fee (based on the cash portion of the purchase price) and an expense reimbursement of no greater than 2% of the cash portion of the purchase price and $50,000.

The business operated a seven-vessel fleet offering “all inclusive luxury voyages” along the Ohio, Mississippi, Tennessee, Illinois, Cumberland, Columbia and Snake Rivers; “all-inclusive luxury cruising” along the Great Lakes, Canada, New England, the Southeast United States, Alaska, Mexico, the Yucatan Peninsula; and an “all-inclusive luxury expedition experience” in Alaska and Central America, including ports in between.

As noted above, the motion contains procedures to dispose of remaining AQV assets including AQV’s fleet not sold through the sale process. The seven-vessel fleet consists of four river vessels, two lake / ocean vessels and one expedition vessel. The debtors note they own six of the vessels, with one being leased or chartered, but provide no further details.

The debtors emphasize that the sale process should proceed “expeditiously” in light of the “significant costs” associated with operating the AQV business, as detailed in the motion, so as to ensure that net sale proceeds are “greater than” the interim costs necessary to maintain the assets.

The debtors disclose they have canceled certain scheduled cruises and terminated employment of substantially all employees of the AQV business, and they anticipate canceling all additional scheduled cruises during the chapter 11 cases.

According to the motion, the debtors’ prepetition marketing efforts in the first half of 2023 and in December 2023 did not yield any actionable bids or actionable indications of interest. The debtors say they are currently continuing discussions with certain parties who indicated an interest in purchasing the AQV assets.

The debtors propose the following sale timeline:
 
  • March 15 at 5 p.m. ET: Stalking horse bidder designation deadline;
  • March 20 at 5 p.m. ET: Sale objection deadline;
  • Earlier of five days after filing stalking horse designation notice and March 20 at 5 p.m. ET: Stalking horse bidder(s) and bid protections objection deadline;
  • March 21: Stalking horse bidder(s) and bid protections hearing;
  • March 25 at 5 p.m. ET: Qualified bid deadline;
  • March 27 at 10 a.m. ET: Auction, if necessary;
  • March 27 (if no auction is held) or March 28 (if an auction is held): Identification of successful bidder and backup bidder, if any, and/or notification to dispose of any remaining AQV assets;
  • April 1 at 5 p.m. ET: Proposed successful bid(s) objection deadline;
  • April 2: Sale hearing, subject to adjournment to comply with assumption and assignment procedures to the extent a qualified bid for the AQV business as a going concern is received;
  • Seven days after service of the AQV asset disposition notice(s): Deadline to object to such notice(s); and
  • “As soon as reasonably practicable” after entry of a sale order: Sale closing date.

Other Motions

The debtors also filed various standard first day motions, including the following:
 
Share this article:
This article is an example of the content you may receive if you subscribe to a product of Reorg Research, Inc. or one of its affiliates (collectively, “Reorg”). The information contained herein should not be construed as legal, investment, accounting or other professional services advice on any subject. Reorg, its affiliates, officers, directors, partners and employees expressly disclaim all liability in respect to actions taken or not taken based on any or all the contents of this publication. Copyright © 2024 Reorg Research, Inc. All rights reserved.
Thank you for signing up
for Reorg on the Record!