Fri 10/04/2019 14:41 PM
Share this article:
Relevant Documents:
Voluntary Petition
Press Release
First Day Declaration
Bid Procedures Motion
Motion to Assume RSA Term Sheet
Cash Collateral/Supply Facility
First Day Hearing Agenda
 
Summary
Agera Energy is a retail electricity and natural gas supplier for commercial and residential customers in numerous states
Began implementing wind-down plan since “at least” August and expects to stop servicing all customers by end of year
Entered into an RSA term sheet with first lien lender BP Energy, through which debtors seek to sell “significant portion” of assets to Exelon subsidiary Constellation via a $24.75M stalking horse bid

Agera Energy, a Briarcliff Manor, N.Y.-based retail electricity and natural gas supplier for commercial, industrial and residential customers, filed for chapter 11 protection today in the Bankruptcy Court for the Southern District of New York, along with several affiliates. The company entered into a restructuring support agreement term sheet with first lien lender BP Energy, which provides for the sale of a “significant portion” of its customer contracts to Constellation, a subsidiary of Exelon Corporation through a $24.75 million stalking horse bid, followed by a chapter 11 plan of liquidation.

The debtors have been implementing a wind-down plan (a copy of which is attached to the RSA term sheet assumption motion) since “at least” August, in consultation with BP, and say that they expect to stop servicing all customers by the end of the year.

The first day hearing is scheduled for today, Oct. 4, at 3 p.m. ET.

The company reports $124.2 million in assets and $207.8 million in liabilities as of July 31. As described in the first day declaration of COO Todd Sandford, the debtors’ prepetition capital structure includes:
 
  • Secured debt:
    • $161.6 million outstanding under first lien “Senior Lien Supply Agreement and Senior Lien ISDA Master Agreement” with BP Energy. The ISDA agreement debt comprises “energy supply liabilities, mark-to-market exposure, and collateral support obligations posted by BP on behalf of the Debtors.” The BP facilities are supported by a pledge of substantially all of Agera Energy’s assets and all of Agera Holding’s equity in Agera Energy (as well as substantially all the assets of debtor energy.me midwest llc and a guarantee by Greg E. Lindberg and another of his companies, Global Health Technology Group, LLC).
    • $35 million in principal outstanding under a second lien revolving credit facility with Colorado Bankers Life Insurance Company. The second lien facility is subordinated to the BP facility.
  • Unsecured debt: $82 million of general unsecured debt, “comprised primarily of trade claims, obligations related to REC and ACP obligations ... and broker commission payments.”
  • Equity: Greg E. Lindberg owns 50% of the total economic interest and 89% of the total voting interest in AGH Parent. “Upon information and belief,” the debtors also say that Lindberg is the beneficial holder of equity interests in approximately 100 independent operating companies, including the debtors, through Lindberg-owned Eli Global LLC.
 
The company was formed by Platinum Partners to purchase the assets of bankrupt Glacial Energy Holdings. Equity owner Greg E. Lindberg was indicted earlier this year for “acts that are wholly unrelated to the Debtors,” according to COO Sandford, who states that Lindberg has no involvement in the debtors’ day-to-day operations. After Lindberg was indicted, the debtors’ management team was replaced and “a number of structural challenges” were uncovered, including poor financial planning and forecasting, suboptimal pricing and risk management and an overstated balance sheet.

As of Aug. 31, 2018, the debtors’ financials included approximately $39 million of overstated receivables, of which $37 million related to unbilled receivables. Consequently, the debtors “suddenly” found themselves in breach of the senior lien supply agreement’s $16 million tangible net worth covenant. After further prepetition defaults, forbearance agreements, state enforcement actions and a prepetition marketing process and signing the APA with Exelon yesterday, Oct. 3, the debtors determined to seek bankruptcy protection.

The debtors are represented by McDermott Will & Emery as counsel and Stifel Nicolaus and Miller Buckfire as investment bankers. The company is also working with GlassRatner Advisory & Capital Group. Stretto is the claims agent. The case has been assigned to Judge Robert Drain (19-23802).

Background

Agera supplies electricity and natural gas to 87 distinct utility regions and provides service to approximately 35,000 customers (75% commercial and 25% residential). The debtors say that they offer their customers “energy choice” through the ability to receive electricity and natural gas from a source other than the local utility in certain markets that have been restructured to permit retail competition, “which allows customers to tailor energy supply to their specific needs.” Approximately 28 states have at least partially deregulated their utility markets. The debtors hold licenses to sell retail electricity in 15 states and retail natural gas in 12 states. The debtors have 56 employees after prepetition staff reductions.

The debtors characterize the retail energy business as, by nature, “very competitive,” with low margins. Agera grew “significantly” in the 18-month period through June 2018, the debtors explain in the filings, largely resulting from selling and onboarding customers on fixed price power contracts, which are “inherently riskier” than variable price contracts.

Upon discovery of the company’s financial issues, the management team developed, and presented in late September 2018, a number of strategic options for Eli Global to assess, ranging from a bankruptcy filing to a turnaround plan. Eli Global ultimately committed to a turnaround plan, “with full recognition of the capital necessary to fund the plan.” The debtors’ business was not expected to be profitable until 2020 given that it had to deal with the run-off of low-and negative-margin customer contracts. The debtors say they were executing the turnaround plan up until the unexpected capital liquidity problems, including the defaults and the loss of funding from Eli Global.

The debtors’ corporate organizational structure is below:
 

The debtors' largest unsecured creditors are listed below:
 
10 Largest Unsecured Creditors
Creditor Location Claim Type Amount
Massachusetts Department
of Public Utilities
Boston Alternative
Compliance
Payment
$   43,920,000
Colorado Bankers Life
Insurance Company
Durham, N.C. Subordinated
Loan
35,699,288
Connecticut Public Utilities
Regulatory Authority
New Britain, Conn. Alternative
Compliance
Payment
8,171,533
New Jersey Board of
Public Utilities
Trenton, N.J. Alternative
Compliance
Payment
7,196,266
Pennsylvania Public
Utilities Commission
Harrisburg, Pa. Alternative
Compliance
Payment
4,907,035
New Hampshire Public
Utilities Commission
Concord, N.H. Alternative
Compliance
Payment
2,009,367
Rhode Island Public
Utilities Commission
Warwick, R.I. Alternative
Compliance
Payment
1,970,394
New York State Energy
Research and Development
Authority
Albany, N.Y. Alternative
Compliance
Payment
1,949,058
California Public Utilities
Commission
San Francisco Alternative
Compliance
Payment
1,447,517
Bretton Daniel DeNomme Avon, Ohio Employee
Commission
436,807

The case representatives are as follows:
 
Representatives
Role Name Firm Location
Debtors' Counsel Timothy W. Walsh McDermott
Will & Emery
New York
Darren Azman
Ravi Vohra
Debtors' Investment
Banker
Richard Klein Stifel Nicolaus /
Miller Buckfire
New York
James Georgiow
Debtors' Financial
Advisor
N/A GlassRatner
Advisory
N/A
Counsel to the Stalking
Horse Bidder
Cecil E. Martin III McGuireWoods Baltimore
Counsel to BP Energy Charles A. Beckham, Jr. Haynes &
Boone
Houston
Kelli S. Norfleet
Kathryn Shurin
Arsalan Muhammad
Counsel to Todd Sandford,
Mark Linzenbold and
Raima Jamal
Matthew P. Ward Womble Bond
Dickinson
Wilmington, Del.
S. Alexander Faris
U.S. Trustee Andrea B. Schwartz Office of the
U.S. Trustee
New York
Shannon Scott
Debtors' Claims Agent Travis Vandell Stretto Ivine, Calif.

Restructuring Support Agreement / Motion to Assume

The debtors seek to assume the RSA term sheet, stressing that without BP’s support, “the Debtors would likely have been forced to file these Chapter 11 Cases as a ‘free fall’ bankruptcy, resulting in additional costs, complications, and potentially significant delays, each of which would have reduced stakeholder recoveries under any restructuring plan.”

The term sheet provides for the following proposed treatment of claims and interests under a plan:
 
  • DIP Financing Claims: Paid in full in cash on the effective date.
  • Administrative Expense Claims: Paid in full in cash on the effective date.
  • Priority Claims: Either (a) payment in full in cash on the effective date or (b) over a period through the fifth anniversary after the petition date, plus interest.
  • Other Secured Claims: Either (a) payment in full in cash from proceeds of the sale allocated to the specific collateral of the claimholder; (b) such other treatment that will render such claim unimpaired or (c) such other treatment as the Agera parties and the applicable claimholder agree.
  • Prepetition BP Secured Claims: Receipt of the following, less any amounts necessary to fund “allowed Administrative Expense Claims, allowed Priority Claims, allowed Other Priority Claims, allowed Other Secured Claims, and the Initial Trust Funding under the Plan (and with respect to professional fees, only with respect to amounts provided for in the Approved Budget, subject to the Permitted Variance)”: (a) all remaining cash held by the Agera parties, (b) all sale proceeds, (c) all proceeds from the sale of any other collateral securing any DIP financing claims or prepetition BP secured claims, subject to Other Secured Claims, (d) 90% of the beneficial interests in the Agera litigation trust relating to the litigation and recovery of the litigation trust causes of action and (e) 100% of proceeds of the liquidation of the “Other Litigation Trust Assets.”
  • General Unsecured Claims: Pro rata share of 10% of the litigation trust beneficial interests.
  • Existing Equity Interests: Cancelled, extinguished and/or discharged.
 
The RSA term sheet also contemplates a litigation trust, including for the distribution of proceeds from avoidance actions, with a trustee to be selected by BP, to be funded with $25,000 in cash.

The RSA term sheet provides for $700,000 for a key employee incentive plan and $1.1 million for a key employee retention plan.

The RSA term sheet provides for the following milestones:
 
  • Interim DIP Financing/Cash Collateral Order: entered within three days of petition date
  • Bid Procedures Order: entered within 14 days of petition date
  • RSA Term Sheet Approval Order: entered within 17 days of petition date
  • Final DIP Financing/Cash Collateral Order: entered within 28 days of petition date
  • Auction: within 31 days of petition date
  • Sale Hearing: within 32 days of petition date
  • Sale Closing: within 60 days after petition date
  • Closing of Sale of Mortgaged Property: Dec. 31
  • Combined Plan/DS Approval Motion: filed within 135 days of petition date
  • Combined Confirmation/DS Approval Order: entered within 180 days of petition date
 
Bid Procedures Motion

Stifel, Nicolaus & Co. and Miller Buckfire ran the debtors’ prepetition sale process, which commenced in May, through which it contacted 207 parties, consisting of 121 strategic investors and 86 financial investors, of which 39 executed confidentiality agreements and 20 were provided access to a virtual data room. The debtors say that they received “numerous” preliminary indications of interest in June, leading to the $24.75 million bid from Exelon Generation Company, LLC, which also provides for the assumption of certain liabilities, subject to certain adjustments for the loss of customer contracts not transferred.

The bulk of the assets to be sold under the stalking horse purchase agreement are the debtors’ customer contracts, which would be assumed and assigned to the stalking horse bidder. The stalking horse bidder, according to the debtors, is a “qualified competitive energy supplier in each jurisdiction in which the Sellers operate.” Through the sale, Agera’s existing customers would be transferred to Constellation.

The debtors propose an expense reimbursement up to a cap of 1% of the base price, as well as a 4% termination fee. Initial overbids must exceed the stalking horse bid plus the termination fee and expense reimbursement by $1 million.

The debtors propose the following sale timeline:
 
  • Bid Procedures Objection Deadline: Oct. 14
  • Bid Procedures Hearing: Oct. 15
  • Bid Deadline: Oct. 29
  • Auction: Nov. 4
  • Sale Hearing: Nov. 5
 
COO Sandford also submitted a declaration in support of the sale motion that is attached to the motion.

Cash Collateral/Supply Facility

The debtors seek approval of DIP financing in the form of (a) the sale of natural gas and electricity on credit from BP Energy Company to Agera Energy, LLC, Aequitas Energy Inc. and energy.me midwest llc (the Agera opco entities), which electricity would be sold in the ordinary course of the debtors’ business to their customers, (b) entry into physically and financially settled hedges with BP Energy Company to hedge the debtors’ exposure to energy price fluctuations “in connection with the customer accounts that the Debtors’ intend to sell in the In-Court Sale” and (c) BP Energy Company’s consent to the continued use of a portion of the debtors’ accounts receivable to fund operating expenses.

“Because the prepetition liens cover substantially all of the Debtors’ assets and are underwater to a significant degree, there is no possibility of securing debtor in possession financing on an unsecured or junior basis or on unencumbered assets,” the debtors stress.

The DIP financing bears interest at LIBOR plus 7.5%, and matures on the earlier of (a) the transfer of all accounts associated with the debtors’ customer contracts to the successful bidder or other third party supplier or the return of such accounts to the applicable utility or local distribution company, (b) the expiry of the “Specified Period” (as defined in the financing motion) and (c) the “Final Assignment Date” (as defined in the Stalking Horse APA).

Adequate Protection

The company proposes the following adequate protection to the prepetition secured parties: replacement liens, superpriority administrative expense claims, payment of all accrued and unpaid fees and expenses including for counsel, and payment on all prepetition obligations under the denior lien transaction documents bi-weekly beginning on Oct. 18 equal to the amount of funds remaining in the collateral accounts and deposit accounts, after giving effect to payments of certain invoices relating to postpetition supply or hedges of natural gas and power, that exceeds $10 million until Dec. 1, 2019, $8 million until Jan. 1, 2020, $6 million until Feb. 1, 2020, and $3 million throughout the remainder of the “Support Period.”

In addition, subject to entry of the final order, the debtors propose a waiver of the estates’ right to seek to surcharge the prepetition and postpetition collateral pursuant to Bankruptcy Code section 506(c) and the “equities of the case” exception under section 552(b).

The carveout for professional fees is $100,000 for the debtors and any official creditors committee, and for Stephen S. Gray or Gray & Company, $50,000 pre-carve out trigger date and $50,000 post-carve out trigger date. Stephen S. Gray was appointed as the sole manager of certain of the debtors and as the sole director of Aequitas. Gray has no prior or current relationship with Eli Global or Lindberg.

DIP Milestones

The DIP financing is subject to the following milestones:
 
  • Bid procedures order: entered within 14 days of petition date
  • RSA order: entered within 17 days of petition date
  • Final DIP order: entered within 28 days of petition date
  • Auction: within 31 days of petition date
  • Sale order: entered within 32 days of petition date
  • Sale closing: within 60 days of petition date
  • Motion Seeking Combined Plan/DS Approval: filed within 135 days of petition date
  • Combined Plan/DS Approval Order: entered within 180 days of petition date
 
The lien challenge deadline is 75 days after entry of the interim order for any party in interest other than an official creditors committee, which would have 60 days from formation.

The proposed budget is HERE (and can be found attached to the motion to assume the RSA term sheet).

Motion to Impose the Automatic Stay

Prior to the petition date, governmental units in Massachusetts, Rhode Island and New Hampshire have taken acts against the debtors with respect to the debtors’ failure to satisfy their 2018 renewable portfolio standard, or RPS, obligations or alternative compliance payment, or ACP, obligations.

According to the motion, the Massachusetts Department of Energy Resources has recommended to the Massachusetts Department of Public Utilities that it revoke or suspend the retail supplier licenses of Agera Energy. The Rhode Island Division of Public Utilities and Carriers has issued Agera Energy a suspension order, under which Agera is prohibited from entering into new contracts or renewing existing contracts with customers in Rhode Island. The state is scheduled to conduct a public hearing on Oct. 22, 2019, to consider whether Agera’s license to sell energy in Rhode Island should be rescinded. The New Hampshire Public Utilities Commission sent Agera Energy a demand letter on Sept. 17, 2019, requesting that Agera satisfy its ACP liability for 2018 within ten days or it may pursue further action, including referral of the unpaid amount for collection to the New Hampshire Department of Justice.

The debtors say that they “may soon be in default” of their RPS obligations in other states and believe that “a specific order from this Court will help to protect the Debtors from improper actions, particularly from the governmental units that granted the Debtors their licenses, who may not be familiar with the Bankruptcy Code or its protections and who might unwittingly otherwise violate those sections.”

The debtors estimate that their inability to satisfy RPS obligations in the normal course has resulted in an aggregate ACP “premium” of approximately 60%, as compared to the cost of acquiring the renewable energy certificates, or RECs, necessary to avoid ACP obligations. As of the petition date, the debtors estimate that they owe more than $72 million on account of REC and ACP obligations for the 2018 compliance year.

Other Motions

The debtors also filed various standard first day motions, including the following:
 
Share this article:
This article is an example of the content you may receive if you subscribe to a product of Reorg Research, Inc. or one of its affiliates (collectively, “Reorg”). The information contained herein should not be construed as legal, investment, accounting or other professional services advice on any subject. Reorg, its affiliates, officers, directors, partners and employees expressly disclaim all liability in respect to actions taken or not taken based on any or all the contents of this publication. Copyright © 2024 Reorg Research, Inc. All rights reserved.
Thank you for signing up
for Reorg on the Record!