Fri 04/08/2022 17:33 PM
Share this article:
UPDATE 1: 5:33 p.m. ET 4/8/2022: U.S. District Judge Robert Molloy has dismissed with prejudice the U.S. Virgin Islands Government Employees’ Retirement System’s, or GERS’, suit against the government of the Virgin Islands. In an order today, the judge granted the parties’ joint motion to terminate the consent judgment related to the government’s statutorily required payroll deductions to GERS in light of the recent enactment of Act 8540.

Act 8540 authorizes the refinancing of the outstanding Matching Fund Revenue bonds and provides for the issuance of a GERS funding note to be deposited into GERS as an in-kind contribution by the government. The law requires that “GERS upon the issuance and delivery of the GERS Funding Note, shall release all pending claims, including all outstanding employer contributions and dismiss all pending litigation against the Government, and that any pending or existing judgments against the Government shall be deemed satisfied,” the parties’ motion explained. This includes the judgment of $20 million to $25 million previously entered in the GERS case. The parties requested dismissal of the case to “facilitate the speedy and effective sale of the bonds” after GERS received the funding note.




Original Story 5:32 p.m. UTC on Feb. 24, 2022

USVI Government, GERS File Joint Motion Seeking 90-Day Stay in Federal Lawsuit Proceedings in Light of GERS Funding Law; Mediation in Local Court Case Still Set for March 21

Relevant Document:
Joint Motion to Stay

The U.S. Virgin Islands government and the USVI Government Employees’ Retirement System, or GERS, today filed a joint motion in the U.S. District Court of the Virgin Islands seeking a 90-day stay in the proceedings.

The motion explains that this month’s enactment of Act 8540 authorizes the refinancing of the outstanding Matching Fund Revenue bonds and provides for the issuance of a GERS funding note to be deposited into GERS as an in-kind contribution by the government. The law requires that “GERS upon the issuance and delivery of the GERS Funding Note, shall release all pending claims, including all outstanding employer contributions and dismiss all pending litigation against the Government, and that any pending or existing judgments against the Government shall be deemed satisfied,” according to the motion.

In light of the funding legislation, the parties ask the court to stay proceedings for 90 days and indicate that once the funding transaction has been completed, the parties will file a joint stipulation of dismissal and joint motion to terminate the consent decree that requires the government to timely remit payments to GERS.

During a USVI Public Finance Authority board meeting last week, officials said they expect to undertake the refinancing of the MFR debt and issue the GERS funding note by the end of March.

Both the government and GERS acknowledge that there is a pending judgment in the federal court case of $20 million to $25 million.

GERS has also filed a local lawsuit against the government asserting that the government payment obligation to GERS includes both a fixed percentage of the payroll of GERS participants and a second “variable contribution … based on the actuarial needs of the GERS to enable it to pay accrued benefits as and when they are due.” Mediation in the case has been ordered to commence by March 21.

During a GERS board meeting last month, GERS attorney Kathy Smith told board members GERS is willing to dismiss the federal court action that has largely been adjudicated. However, rather than dismissing the GERS lawsuit in USVI Superior Court, GERS would prefer to sign a consent judgment in the case so that the court would retain jurisdiction and provide an enforcement mechanism should any party fail to comply with the funding agreement.
Share this article:
This article is an example of the content you may receive if you subscribe to a product of Reorg Research, Inc. or one of its affiliates (collectively, “Reorg”). The information contained herein should not be construed as legal, investment, accounting or other professional services advice on any subject. Reorg, its affiliates, officers, directors, partners and employees expressly disclaim all liability in respect to actions taken or not taken based on any or all the contents of this publication. Copyright © 2024 Reorg Research, Inc. All rights reserved.
Thank you for signing up
for Reorg on the Record!